You can now create super quizzes in our flag and language games by combining questions from multiple pages using the load= parameter in the URL.

How it works:
Add ?load= followed by quiz IDs (separated by commas) to combine them with your current quiz.

Examples:
https://ekvis.com/en/esani02/?load=esani01 – Combines esani02 + esani01
https://ekvis.com/en/esani02/?load=esani01,esbod01 – Combines esani02 + esani01 + esbod01

You can now bookmark the new page or send the url to other players.

The id to use in the load= string comes from the url of the pages. In the url: https://ekvis.com/en/esani02/ the id is the part after en/, so esani02. If you want to add those questions to another quiz, go to the other quiz and add ?load=esani02 to that url

If you want to combine more than two quizzes, use , between the id and no spaces in the list ?load=esani01,esani02

To get a random sample, add all quizzes you want to select from with the load parameter, then limit the length of the quiz with the parameter max by adding &max=(number of questions in the new quiz)

Note that after the last id in the load section, there needs to be an & (ampersand) character before the max=10 or what length you prefer on the new quiz. Example: https://ekvis.com/en/esani02/?load=esani01,esbod01&max=8

Iran’s current national flag, adopted in 1980 after the Islamic Revolution, features a green-white-red tricolor with a stylized “Allah” emblem and “Allahu Akbar” repeated 22 times. It replaced the historic Lion and Sun flag used under the Pahlavi monarchy.

Since late 2025, massive protests have revived the Lion and Sun symbol as a powerful sign of opposition. Demonstrators have burned or torn down the official flag, raised the pre-1979 version in cities across Iran, and replaced it at embassies abroad (e.g., London in January 2026). Diaspora rallies worldwide show the same emblem, often alongside calls for regime change.

In a notable digital gesture, X (formerly Twitter) updated its Iran flag emoji to a modern Lion and Sun design in January 2026, amplifying the symbol globally—even on Iranian state-linked accounts.

As of March 2, 2026, no official change is happening. The regime, despite Supreme Leader Khamenei’s death on February 28, 2026, in U.S.-Israeli strikes, still flies its flag and views the Lion and Sun as a direct threat to its identity.

A formal redesign would require regime collapse or major reform, which is possible amid the ongoing unrest, but uncertain. Opposition groups disagree: some want the Lion and Sun restored, others a completely new design.

For now, two flags coexist: the official one on government buildings, and the Lion and Sun in protesters’ hands and on screens worldwide. The real change has already begun symbolically. The official one depends on Iran’s political future.

Equatorial Guinea is a small country in Central Africa. For many years, its capital city has been Malabo, which is located on an island called Bioko. However, the government has decided to move the capital to a new city on the mainland.

The new capital is called Ciudad de la Paz. It was previously known as Oyala. This city is located in the mainland part of the country, known as Río Muni. The new capital was announced in Januari 2026.

One reason for the move is geography. Most of Equatorial Guinea’s land area and population are on the mainland, not on the island where Malabo is located. By moving the capital, the government says it will be easier to manage the country and connect different regions.

Ciudad de la Paz is a planned city. This means it was designed in advance, with wide roads, government buildings, and space for future development. Many important government institutions have already started moving there, but Malabo is still used for some official purposes.

The change of capital is a gradual process. It takes many years to move ministries, offices, and workers. Because of this, some people still think of Malabo as the capital, even though the government has officially named Ciudad de la Paz as the new one.

“Ciudad de la Paz” means “the City of Peace” in Spanish. Equatorial Guinea is the only Spanish-speaking country in Africa.

The Greater Idaho Movement is a political idea in the United States that aims to change the border between two states: Oregon and Idaho. Supporters want a large part of eastern Oregon to leave Oregon and instead become part of Idaho. The goal is to create a new, bigger Idaho—hence the name “Greater Idaho.”

Where the idea comes from

Oregon is divided by culture and politics. The western part of the state, where most people live (in cities like Portland and Eugene), tends to vote for liberal or progressive policies. The eastern part of the state is much more rural and conservative. Many people there feel that the state government in Portland does not represent their values or priorities.

Because of this, some local groups in eastern Oregon began promoting the idea of joining Idaho, which has a more conservative government. They believe Idaho’s laws on issues like taxes, guns, and environmental rules fit their views better.

What supporters want

The Greater Idaho movement does not want to create a new state. Instead, it wants to move the existing border so that about 15 counties from eastern Oregon would officially become part of Idaho. That would give Idaho more land and population, while western Oregon would become smaller.

Supporters say this would:

• Give people in eastern Oregon a government that matches their values.
• Make local communities feel more represented.
• Reduce tension between rural and urban areas.

What critics say

Opponents argue that changing state borders is not practical. They point out that:

• Both the Oregon and Idaho legislatures would have to agree to the change.
• The U.S. Congress would also have to approve it.
• The process would be long, expensive, and extremely unlikely to succeed.

Critics also say that dividing the state further would not solve the real problems—such as economic inequality, rural decline, and lack of communication between different political groups.

What has happened so far

Since 2020, several eastern Oregon counties have held local votes on whether they support exploring the idea of joining Idaho. Most of those counties voted “yes,” but these votes are only symbolic. They do not have any legal power to move the border.

Some Idaho politicians have said they are open to talking about it, but the Oregon government has not shown interest. For now, the movement remains mostly a political statement rather than a real plan.

Why it matters

Even though the border is unlikely to change, the Greater Idaho Movement shows how divided U.S. politics can be between cities and rural areas. Many people across the country feel disconnected from state or federal governments, and this idea reflects that frustration.

Learn more about Idaho by playing or map quiz game: https://ekvis.com/en/g-us-id/

The world map has stayed mostly the same for decades, with countries keeping their borders even during big conflicts. But in 2026, some ongoing disputes could lead to changes in who controls certain territories. These aren’t guaranteed—geopolitics is unpredictable—but experts are watching a few hot spots closely.

Russia and Ukraine

The war between Russia and Ukraine continues to affect Europe’s borders. Russia currently controls parts of eastern and southern Ukraine, including Crimea, which it took in 2014. Most countries still recognize these areas as Ukrainian territory.

By 2026, the front lines could change again, depending on how the war develops. If Ukraine retakes more land, its borders could move back toward how they looked before 2022. If Russia keeps control, those borders might remain frozen, even if the rest of the world refuses to accept them as official. Kyiv will remain the capital of Ukraine.

Bougainville

Bougainville is an island region that belongs to Papua New Guinea. In a 2019 referendum, almost everyone there voted to become independent. Since then, leaders from Bougainville and Papua New Guinea have been negotiating how and when that independence might happen.

If all goes according to plan, Bougainville could become a new country around 2026 or 2027. The capital would probably be either Buka or Arawa. If independence happens, Bougainville would be the first new country recognized by the United Nations since South Sudan in 2011.

New Caledonia

New Caledonia is a group of islands in the Pacific that is currently part of France. It already has some self-rule but will hold another vote in 2026 to decide its future. Voters can choose between remaining part of France with more autonomy or moving toward full independence. Nouméa would remain the capital in either case. The result of this vote could shape the islands’ future for decades.

Kosovo and Serbia

Kosovo declared independence from Serbia in 2008, but Serbia has never accepted it. Over the years, some politicians have discussed a possible land swap to settle the dispute—giving Serbia control of some Serb-majority areas in northern Kosovo and Kosovo control of Albanian-majority areas in southern Serbia.

No agreement has been reached, but international talks may continue in 2026. If a deal were made, it would be one of the first official border changes in Europe in many years.

Greenland

Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark but has its own parliament and government. It aims to become fully independent in the future. That will not happen in 2026, but Greenland might take more steps toward self-government. Nuuk will stay the capital, and independence could still be several years away.

Taiwan and China

China sees Taiwan as part of its territory and has not ruled out force to unify. Taiwan functions as an independent democracy. Experts watch for increased pressure like military exercises, but a full invasion is considered low probability in 2026. No border change is expected soon.

Greater Idaho

In the United States, some people in eastern Oregon want their region to become part of Idaho. A few local votes have supported this idea, but changing state borders is very difficult. Both state legislatures and the U.S. Congress would have to approve, which makes it very unlikely to happen anytime soon.

Since 2010, Iran’s government has considered relocating the national capital away from Tehran. The reasons include severe air pollution, traffic congestion, overpopulation, and the high risk of earthquakes. Tehran has grown rapidly and now has over 13 million residents in its metropolitan area.

The issue returned to the spotlight in 2025, when President Ebrahim Raisi stated in October that a relocation is necessary due to worsening water shortages and Tehran’s overstretched infrastructure. His statement marked increased political pressure to act after years of stalled debate.

The proposal was formally endorsed by the Iranian parliament in 2010, and a council was established to explore alternatives. The plan could involve transferring governmental functions to another city, while Tehran would remain the country’s economic center. Similar arrangements exist in other countries, such as South Africa and the Netherlands.

Cities such as Isfahan, Qom, and Semnan have been mentioned as potential new capitals. So far, however, no concrete move has taken place, largely due to economic and administrative obstacles. Still, the crisis of 2025 may prove to be a turning point in the long-running discussion.